News
Home > News

Teens' Interviews Shed More Light on Beating Case

Prosecutors' recordings suggest video camera added to fuel when group attacked girl.

Published: Thursday, June 26, 2008 at 1:51 a.m.
Last Modified: Thursday, June 26, 2008 at 7:43 a.m.

BARTOW | New interviews by prosecutors provide more insight into the infamous videotaped beating of a former Mulberry High School cheerleader.

April Cooper
Brittini Hardcastle
Kayla Hassell
Britney Mayes
Mercades Nichols

Kayla Hassall, 15, of Mulberry, who faces criminal charges in the case that has garnered national attention, spoke with prosecutors in a June 11 interview about the beating.

Eight teenagers were accused in the thrashing of Victoria "Tori" Lindsay, 17, of Lakeland on March 30, and of threatening to post video footage of the attack on the MySpace and YouTube Web sites.

In audio recordings recently obtained by The Ledger, Hassall is heard telling prosecutors that the presence of the video camera might have helped fuel the teenagers' fury, and she identifies who she says were the primary aggressors in the attack.

"Do you think that the camera had encouraged it?" she was asked.

"Yes, probably," Hassall answered.

Hassall explained why she thought the incident spun out of control.

"Tori, as long as we've all known her, as many times as people tried to work things out with her, she has e-mailed every single one of us numerous numbers of times and has threatened to fight every single one of us, but never has tried to," Hassall said.

"Why do you think it (the beating) went as far as it did?" prosecutors asked.

"Because people were probably tired of her running her mouth and saying all that stuff, so they probably were like, in my opinion, 'OK, because she was always saying she's going to fight us and she's going to beat .<0x200A>.<0x200A>. us, well, OK, I'm going to do that to her.'<0x200A>"

Hassall said her mother's video camera was used to capture the beating, but she said someone else did the filming.

She identifies two girls, Brittini Hardcastle, 17, and April Cooper, 15, both of Lakeland, as being the ones who punched Lindsay, and Brittany Mayes, 17, of Lakeland as being responsible for filming the attack.

She insists Mercades Nichols, 17, told Lindsay to leave and wasn't part of the attack. The beating happened at Nichols' grandmother's Highland City home, where Nichols was living and where Lindsay had been staying.

Nichols has been characterized by Polk County Sheriff Grady Judd as coordinating the attack and "luring" Lindsay to her home.

But Hassall said Hardcastle actually warned Lindsay what could happen if she went to the house.

"Brittini texted her, I think it was off Mercades' phone, saying 'If you come in the house with an attitude, I'm going to fight you,'<0x200A>" Hassall told prosecutors.

Hassall said she didn't intervene to try to stop the beating because she was afraid of Hardcastle.

"I was afraid that if I were, because Brittini was so mad, I was afraid that if I was to get in between her and Tori, like if I were to try and stand between her and Tori and tell her to stop, that she would have hit me. And being as how little I am, she would have done worse to me than she would have done to Tori," Hassall said.

Hassall and four of the girls originally arrested continue to face charges of kidnapping and battery.

Earlier this month, charges were dropped against three teenagers who had been accused in the beating - Cara Murphy, 16, of Lakeland and Stephen Schumaker, 18, and Zachary Ashley, 17, both of Highland City - because there was insufficient evidence against them.

Schumaker and Ashley had been accused of acting as lookouts, but Hassall said the boys were not there.

Murphy, Schumaker and Ashley have also given recorded statements to prosecutors.

Hassall told prosecutors she's sorry for what happened.

"When you watch all the news and people say like we feel no remorse for her, I know I tell my mom at least maybe twice, three times a week that I do feel bad for her, because things should have never gone as far as they did. Never."

[ Jason Geary can be reached at jason.geary@theledger.com or 863-802-7536. ]


This story appeared in print on page A1

Comments

  1. elidine says...
    June 26, 2008 4:40:24 am

    RE: http://www.theledger.com/article/20080626/NEWS/806260486

    I?m torn on this issue. On one hand, I think if you are there and witness the violence and do nothing to stop it, you are essentially going along with it and should be charged as if you participated in it. I don?t buy the whole ? I was too scared to say anything ?.
    I think it was all premeditated, as it appears they had the video camera ready. The girls who didn?t want to get involved probably had plenty of time to leave, but didn?t.

    The guys outside acting as lookouts should be charged also. It doesn?t matter if they didn?t actually hit the girl, the participated in it, and should be charged as such.

    On the other hand, if the girls who had their charges dropped didn?t actually hit the girl, their charges shouldn?t be as severe as the ones who actively participated.

    I don?t buy the whole ?we beat her up because we were tired of her mouth? argument. That just doesn?t fly with me.

  2. stevenmarkus353 says...
    June 26, 2008 4:52:38 am

    I think Kayla does genuinely feel SOME remorse. Although she is trying to put forth a more innocent image than is reality... Kayla jumped in and yelled at Tori at one point in the video (she is the one wearing blue). She wasn't COMPLETELY scared obviously.I hope she learns from this experience to choose better friends -- friends that won't get you charged as an accessory to felony crimes.Off topic a bit.. but worthy of mention... Brittni Hardcastle will be in court in less than an hour from now to ask that her gag order be lifted, this according to Fox 13.

  3. jdupree2 says...
    June 26, 2008 6:21:56 am

    These white trash need to be put in prison for a long time. They have no right to live with decent people. They must have led miserable lives turn out like they did. Probally none of them had fathers to teach them anything.

  4. gadawg_bigdawg says...
    June 26, 2008 6:38:58 am

    I personally believe that all of these young adults have been "well groomed" by there lawyers as to "How to act, say and try to perceive themselves as being innocent as "Mom and apple pie"...
    Lets review the video that plainly shows that this atrocious beating was well planed and executed.
    The question asked as to what escalated the beating? Has no bearing on as to why it was planed and delivered with accomplishes standing guard at the doors to alert those within.
    These young adults need to be tried as such and the proper sentencing given to each. Of no less than 20 too 30 years or better. Kidnapping alone has a mandatory "Life" sentence.
    As to the others that were released for whatever reason.... It will be just a matter of time that the public will probably hear of them again with yet.... another problem with the local authorities.

  5. _Jack_ says...
    June 26, 2008 7:03:36 am

    Ediline read what you write... "didn't actually hit the girl" ... They were charged with battery (The unlawful touching of another) and kidnapping. The charges were dropped because there was no eveidence to indicate they did such crimes. Our grandstanding sheriff thought it would look better on TV and on his record if he had kiddnapping arrests solving such a crime. Blame the sheriff if proper charges might have been filed and were not.There is no doubt that Judd knows what charges could be filed and what charges would be proper and result in a possible conviction. He chose charges that are unusual, and envolk heavy emotion. Your anger is misplaced and should be directed at the person that could have done his job properly charging the youths properly with appropriate crimes.

  6. elidine says...
    June 26, 2008 7:14:13 am

    I guess what I meant was, if a battery charge won?t stick, then charge them as an accessory or collaborator. They participated in the crime, they should be charged with the correct crime.

  7. stevenmarkus353 says...
    June 26, 2008 7:31:14 am

    Sigh.. Brittni hardcastle got her house arrest lifted. Judge Spoto what are you THINKING?!

    Raw video of her appearance: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=opE2647f8aQ

    Thanks whoever posted it

  8. cclark223 says...
    June 26, 2008 7:32:17 am

    You say the guys should be charged for being lookouts, but if you haven't noticed everyone has stated that the boys weren't there, and didn't know about what was going on inside. Apparently someone was mistaken about them being involved. How can you still feel they should be charged?

  9. stevenmarkus353 says...
    June 26, 2008 7:39:27 am

    Apparently Schumaker was shown the video shortly after the incident. Why did he fail to report the crime?

  10. da_buccaneer says...
    June 26, 2008 8:18:55 am

    Like, well, like you know like white trash like does like white like trash like is...like...I was like...like....
    An entire group of illiterates come from an entire network of greater illiterates. Welcome to Polk County...like...