Crossfire in Class
A Teacher Is on the Front Line as Faith, Science Clash
Last Modified: Sunday, September 7, 2008 at 12:20 a.m.
ORANGE PARK - David Campbell switched on the overhead projector and wrote "Evolution" in the rectangle of light on the screen.
Click to enlarge
- Evolution-Bill Tweak Rejected
- House Passes 'Critical Analysis' Measure on Evolution Teaching
- Bill Stirs Up Evolution Fight
- Nobel Laureate Stumps for Evolution
- Lawmakers May Dodge Evolution Requirement
- Actor Promotes Bill to Allow Evolution Debate
- Science Standards Options Proposed
- Divided Panel Puts Evolution in the Books
- Evolution Controversy Settled, In Theory
- Officials to Decide on Science Today
- Education Board to Listen on Evolution
- Proposed Science Standards Debated
- Standards to Be Discussed Today
- Teachers Leery About Subject of Evolution
- Lawmaker: Call Evolution 'Theory'
He scanned the faces of the sophomores in his Biology I class. Many of them, he knew from years of teaching high school in this Jacksonville suburb, had been raised to take the biblical creation story as truth.
His gaze rested for a moment on Bryce Haas, a football player who attended the 6 a.m. prayer meetings of the Fellowship of Christian Athletes in the school gymnasium.
"If I do this wrong," Campbell remembers thinking on that humid spring morning, "I'll lose him."
In February, the Florida Department of Education modified its standards to explicitly require, for the first time, the state's public schools to teach evolution, calling it "the organizing principle of life science." Spurred in part by legal rulings against school districts seeking to favor religious versions of natural history, more than a dozen other states have also given more emphasis in recent years to what has long been the scientific consensus: that all of the diverse life forms on Earth descended from a common ancestor, through a process of mutation and natural selection, over billions of years.
But in a nation where evangelical Protestantism and other Christian traditions stress a literal reading of the biblical description of God individually creating each species, students often arrive at school fearing that evolution, and perhaps science itself, is hostile to their faith.
Some come armed with "Ten questions to ask your biology teacher about evolution," a document circulated on the Internet that highlights supposed weaknesses in evolutionary theory. Others scrawl their opposition on homework assignments. Many just tune out.
With a mandate to teach evolution but little guidance as to how, science teachers are contriving their own ways to turn a culture war into a lesson plan. How they fare may bear on whether a new generation of Americans embraces scientific evidence alongside religious belief.
"If you see something you don't understand, you have to ask 'why?' or 'how?' Campbell often admonished his students at Ridgeview High School.
Yet their abiding mistrust in evolution, he feared, jeopardized their belief in the basic power of science to explain the natural world - and their ability to make sense of it themselves.
Passionate on the subject, Campbell had helped to devise the state's new evolution standards, which will be phased in starting this fall. A former Navy flight instructor not used to pulling his punches, he fought hard for their passage. But with his students this spring, he found himself treading carefully, as he tried to bridge an ideological divide that stretches well beyond his classroom. He started with Mickey Mouse.
On the projector, Campbell placed slides of the cartoon star: one at his skinny genesis in 1928; one from his 1940 turn as the impish Sorcerer's Apprentice; and another of the rounded, ingratiating charmer of Mouse Club fame.
"How," he asked his students, "has Mickey changed?"
Natives of Walt Disney World's home state, they waved their hands and called out answers.
"His tail gets shorter," Bryce volunteered.
"Bigger eyes!" someone else shouted.
"He looks happier," one girl observed. "And cuter."
Campbell smiled. "Mickey evolved," he said. "And Mickey gets cuter because Walt Disney makes more money that way. That is 'selection.'
Later, he would get to the touchier part, about how the minute changes in organisms that drive biological change arise spontaneously, without direction. And how a struggle for existence among naturally varying individuals has helped to generate every species, living and extinct, on the planet.
For now, it was enough that they were listening.
When Florida's last set of science standards came out in 1996, soon after Campbell took the teaching job at Ridgeview, he studied them in disbelief. Though they included the concept that biological "changes over time" occur, the word evolution was not mentioned.
He called his district science supervisor. "Is this really what they want us to teach for the next 10 years?" he demanded.
Campbell, 52, who majored in biology while putting himself through Cornell University on a Reserve Officers Training Corps scholarship, taught evolution anyway. But like nearly a third of biology teachers across the country, and more in his politically conservative district, he regularly heard from parents voicing complaints.
With no school policy to back him up, he spent less time on the subject than he would have liked.
But at the inaugural meeting of the Florida Citizens for Science, which he co-founded in 2005, he vented his frustration. "The kids are getting hurt," Campbell told teachers and parents. "We need to do something."
The morning after his Mickey Mouse gambit, he bounced a pink rubber Spalding ball on the classroom's hard linoleum floor.
Thwack. "Gravity," he said. "I can do this until the end of the semester, and I can only assume that it will work the same way each time."
He looked around the room. "Bryce, what is it called when natural laws are suspended - what do you call it when water changes into wine?"
"Miracle?" Bryce supplied.
Campbell nodded. The ball hit the floor again.
"Science explores nature by testing and gathering data," he said. "It can't tell you what's right and wrong. It doesn't address ethics. But it is not anti-religion. Science and religion just ask different questions."
He grabbed the ball and held it still.
"Can anybody think of a question science can't answer?"
"Is there a God?" shot back a boy near the window.
"Good," said Campbell, an Anglican who attends church most Sundays. "Can't test it. Can't prove it, can't disprove it. It's not a question for science."
This story appeared in print on page A1
Next Article in Latest News
-
AT&T Cutting 12,000 Jobs
NEW YORK | AT&T says it is cutting 12,000 jobs, or about 4 percent of its work force, because of the economic downturn.
The Dallas-based telecommunications company said Thursday the job cuts will take place in December and throughout...
Events Calendar More Events Submit Event
- Student Who Died In Fall Was Drunk
- Jealousy Drove Slayings Of Singer's Family
- Ex-School Secretary Pleads Guilty in Theft of $63,000
- 1st Walls Go Up for Sheriff's Center
- Lakeland's Christmas Parade Steps Off Tonight
- Lakeland's Canady Sworn In To Florida's Supreme Court
- Signs of Deepening Recession Multiply
- Todd Bentley Controversy Continues
- Deputies Bust Small Meth Lab in Haven
- AP Sports Wednesday
- Breaking: AT&T Cutting 12,000 Jobs 1 min ago
- Breaking: Injury Accident Reported on U.S. 27 North 26 min ago
- AP Sports Thursday 42 min ago
- AP Sports Thursday 42 min ago
- Calif. Train Engineer Not on Drugs Before Crash 42 min ago
- Breaking: Store Owner Shot Two Days After His Brother Wounded 50 min ago
- This Season’s Must-Have: The Humble Coupon 3 hrs ago
- An Online Sales Boom That May Not Last 3 hrs ago
- A Rush Into Refinancing as Mortgage Rates Fall 3 hrs ago
- Extended Drug Therapy for Hepatitis Is Challenged 3 hrs ago
