Polk Moms

Connecting moms in Polk County, Fla.



I just came across this today and it's blowing my mind.


I always knew that it was a complete scam that - for several decades - thousands and thousands of Americans would ROUTINELY have their tonsils removed.


Of course, if you were to go against that back then you'd probably be accused of being "anti-science", etc and so-forth.


Now that practice has stopped - on a large scale anyhow - and it's now known that the tonsils fight infection.


Could the stopping of this practice be one of the main factors that brought the polio epidemic under control rather than the vaccines?


First, take a look at this very short 1942 article from Time Magazine:

Medicine: Tonsils and Polio


Five of the six children of an Akron family had their tonsils out one day last summer and within 48 hours all five came down with infantile paralysis. Three of them died. The sixth child did not contract paralysis. There had been no epidemic of the disease in Akron and none followed. A group of researchers from the University of Michigan, Western Reserve University and Akron's Children's Hospital investigated this puzzling case, published their findings last fortnight in the A.M.A. Journal.


The investigators discovered that the infantile paralysis (poliomyelitis) virus was present in the feces of the sixth child. They also found the virus in two groups of cousins with whom the children had come in contact, and in one family of neighborhood playmates—ten children in all. Yet none of these children, though harboring the polio virus, got the disease.


The researchers conclude that in the case of the five paralyzed children the tonsil operation was "the precipitating factor," warn doctors and parents that tonsil operations are dangerous during the poliomyelitis season (summer and fall), even though the disease "is not notably prevalent in a community." Probable connection between tonsillectomies and poliomyelitis: nerves injured by surgery are more susceptible to polio infection, so that the latent virus could travel readily from the injured throat nerves to the medulla oblongata, where the spinal cord enters the brain.

Now this short article from Time from 1954:

Medicine: Tonsils & Bulbar Polio


Doctors are pretty well agreed that it is unwise to remove tonsils or adenoids while polio is rampant: within a month or two after such an operation, an invasion by the polio virus is more likely to result in the oftentimes fatal bulbar form of the disease. Last week the A.M.A. Journal called the attention of U.S. family doctors to growing evidence that polio victims who have lost tonsils, adenoids, or both, at any time in their lives, are more susceptible to bulbar and bulbo-spinal attacks.


The Journal conceded that the case is not yet proved. (For one thing, doctors can only guess at a possible explanation—that the tonsils and adenoids are part of a defensive mechanism against the invading virus.) But, the editors concluded, the evidence is enough to make surgeons pause once again before they cut out tonsils, and ask: "Is this operation really necessary?"

Further quotes:


The paralysis associated with tonsillectomy was a type called ‘bulbar’—the worst, involving the lungs.

Doctor’s are starting to think that the polio epidemics of the 1940’s and 1950’s may have been caused by the high number of tonsillectomies done in the 1920’, 30’s and 40’s. They have discovered that the only area of the body that can synthesize the antibody to poliomyelitis is the tonsils. If you don’t have tonsils you can’t fight off polio.

"I also pointed out that the medical profession’s love affair with routine tonsillectomies was also a factor. At the time, around 1910’ish, doctors decided that these things which now seemed to get so p****, were obviously no used, so should be whipped out. And while we’re at it, why not take them out before they became a problem. In America, by the 1950’s, every year, 2.2 million babies were born. Guess what, 2 million tonsils were also removed. What a wonderful industry this was too. But what they didn’t realise was that anyone without tonsils had a 600% greater chance of getting paralytic polio, because the tonsils are the primary defence of the body against polio virus."--Hilary Butler


"During the polio epidemics it was found that people who had their tonsils removed were 3-5 times more likely to develop paralysis….There were many at that time that suggested that polio was an iatrogenic disease…..we caused thousands of cases of paralysis. We did not cause the polio , but we converted people who would have recovered from a vial illness into people with a paralytic illness."—Dr Mark Donohoe MB BS


I would like to refer to something that Dr. Donohoe said in reference to a question about polio because it is such an important point and really causes us to question whether the polio vaccine has, in fact, been responsible for the decline in paralytic disease or if it is just another coincidence. `How many people here had their tonsils out back in the 50s and 60s? (the majority of the audience held up their hands) How many have children now who have had their tonsils out? A couple. Do you ever wonder why the medical profession drops a procedure? Certainly not because they have paid their cars off. `There was a problem in that we were removing tonsils from people throughout the 40s and 50s. They were taken to be extra tissue not needed by humans, but only a source of trouble. Then, during the polio epidemics, it was found that people who had had their tonsils removed were three to five times more likely to develop paralysis. That does not mean that they got the polio virus more frequently, simply that without the protection of the lymphatic tissue in the throat, there appeared to be a quite strong association between getting the polio virus and developing an illness. There were many at that time who suggested that paralytic polio was an iatrogenic ( ed note -medically-caused) disease. The medical profession dropped tonsillectomy as if it were a hot potato, but I don't know that it told many about that. Certainly, it did not tell me, in my medical school, why tonsillectomies were becoming so much less popular. I had mine removed; virtually everybody in my community did. It is one of those forgotten truths in Australian medicine, and world-wide medicine, that we removed tonsils at our own risk. We thought there was no problem. The iatrogenic part of it was that we caused thousands of cases of paralysis. We did not cause the polio, but we converted people who would have recovered from a viral illness into people with a paralytic illness. To this day, I don't think the medical profession has owned up to that problem that it caused in the Australian health community.

"Dr. R. V. Southcott (Med. Jour. .Aust. 1953. ii. 281) believes that a child whose tonsils were removed at the usual age of 5-7 yrs suffers trauma to the nerves of the pharynx which increases susceptibility to bulbar poliomyelitis for at least ten years. In an outbreak in South Australia in 1947-48 he found that in 35 out of 39 cases of bulbar poliomyelitis the patient had been tonsillectomised)."--M. Meadow Bayly, M.R.C.S.,


Views: 4244

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion


This article is archived and you have to pay to read it, but here's the headline which says it all:

NY Times Headline - May 13, 1946:



If anyone really is interested in reading the entire article, I'll go ahead and splurge for the $3.95.


Are any of you old enough to remember when doctors were slicing tonsils out of most every kid back in the 40s, 50s and 60s?

I guess we just write that whole era off as one big "ooops", perhaps?

Are there any other medical practices we are presently enduring of which we should be questioning as well?

Is it possible we are now experiencing even more medical/scientific "ooopses"?


Is it "nutty" to question various practices of the medical establishment?

Is it "nutty" to question the government which legalizes and mandates many of these practices?

Is it "nutty" to question the motives of the media and schools which are funded - in large part - by the medical establisment?


Here's more "science" that was being perpetrated on people in this nation back in the 40s, 50s and 60s by the "experts" that most assuredly helped create and sustain those man-made epidemics:

Contract Mexican laborers being fumigated with the pesticide DDT in
Hidalgo, Texas, in 1956. Leonard Nadel, Courtesy National Museum of American History

And everything and everyone else was sprayed with DDT:

Following a recent extensive trip through the South, Dr. Mobbs informed me that wherever DDT had been used intensively against polio, not only was there an epidemic of the syndrome I have described but the incidence of polio continued to rise and in fact appeared where it had not been before. This is not surprising since it is known that not only can DDT poisoning produce a condition that may easily be mistaken for polio in an epidemic but also being a nerve poison itself, may damage cells in the spinal cord and thus increase the susceptibility to the virus. [1950] Statement On Clinical Intoxication From DDT And Other New Insecticides by Morton S. Biskind, M.D.



There's a headline I posted above from the New York Times from 1946 that didn't include the article.

I went ahead and purchased that article today for 3 bucks so you all could enjoy it - AND - to help confirm that polio was/is - IN FACT - a man-made epidemic:

Polio Danger Noted In Tonsil Removal

New York Times, May, 13th, 1946

The National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis warned parents yesterday to avoid, if possible, the removal of children’s tonsils before and during the hot summer months when poliomyelitis
was most prevalent.

The foundation, with headquarters at 120 Broadway, cited results
of a recent study to support its contention that July, August and
September were unfavorable for such operations in relation to possible
polio infection.

The study was made at the Medical School of the University of Utah under the sponsorship of the foundation’s Salt Lake County chapter. Infection among children during the 1943 polio epidemic in Utah in relation to prior tonsillectomies was analyzed.

Children between 3 and 16 years’ old were found to be 2.62 times more vulnerable to polio infection after a recent tonsillectomy than the general child population. The group was also discovered to be “sixteen times more vulnerable to a more severe type of polio infection than the average.”




Here's a great new article by Doctor Sherri Tenpenny:


The Tale of Polio




Dr. Tenpenny on Vaccines


by Dr. Tenpenny on Vaccines on Saturday, September 24, 2011 at 12:12am

I’m reading a fascinating book called, “Polio: An American Story” by David Oshinsky. This is an excerpt from the introduction I wanted to share: 


"In 1949, San Angelo, Texas outbreak of polio in kids….Since poliovirus was often found in human feces and on the legs of houseflies, Dr RE Elvins, the city health officer, clued for a heavy spraying of DDT, singling out the open pit toilets on the "Latin American" and "Negro" side of town….. Blaming the epidemic on the "wetbacks" who migrated north each year, monitoring the health of migrant workers become the target…


San Angelo bought two fogging machines to bathe the city in DDT. Twice each day, flatbed trucks would rumble through the streets, spraying the chemical from large hoses while children danced innocently in the mist that trailed behind. As a goodwill gesture, the local Sherwin-Williams store provided DDT at no cost, urging customers to drench the walls and furniture in their homes…..


By mind-June more than half of San Angelo's 160 hospital beds were filled by polio patients, almost all of them children under 15. 


No disease drew as much attention or struck the same terror, as polio….It killed some of its victims and marked others for life, leaving behind vivd reminders for all to see: wheelchairs, crutches, leg braces, breathing devices, deformed limbs.


But in truth, polio was never the raging epidemic portrayed in the media, not even at its height in the 1940s and 1950s.  Ten times as many children would be killed in accidents in those years, and three times as many would die of cancer. Polio's special status was due, in large part, to the efforts of the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis, which employed the latest techniques in advertising, fund raising and motivational research to turn a horrific but relatively uncommon disease in to the most feared affliction of its time. 


…The genius of the National Foundation lay in its ability to single out polio for special attention, making it seem more ominous and more cur ale than other diseases. This strategy would revolutionize the way charities raised money, recruited volunteers organized local chapters and penetrated medical research. The new model created philanthropy as consumerism and in turn, funded a furious competition for a vaccine…The Salk trials would have a profound impact on the federal government’s role in testing and licensing future drugs and vaccines. "


Here's the Amazon link to the book: http://www.amazon.com/Polio-American-David-M-Oshinsky/dp/0195307143...

Reply to Discussion


© 2018   Created by Ledger Media.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service