Polk Moms

Connecting moms in Polk County, Fla.

Weatherman Admits Military Spraying Aluminum and Plastic In The Sky

.

 

I usually don't bring up things like this because everyone thinks it's so nutty.

 

But what happens when we have weathermen who are former military talking about it on mainstream newscasts?

 

At that point you can no longer ignore the 'elephant in the room'.

 

Check out what he has to say at approx 1-minute into the video:

 

 

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/9Yl0Dc9EGZE&hl=en_US&fs=1&">... name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9Yl0Dc9EGZE&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

Tags: chemtrails, eugenics, genocide, military, modification, spraying, weather

Views: 94

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

.

Oh well, I guess my attempt at embedding the video had massive failure and it won't let me edit.

Take TWO !!!!!


" target="_blank">
And I thought we were the only ones who paid attention to the chemtrails all over polk county!!! Thanks for this link. More sheeple need to wake up!
jessica payne said:
And I thought we were the only ones who paid attention to the chemtrails all over polk county!!! Thanks for this link. More sheeple need to wake up!


All of the spraying tends to go on all over the NATO countries.

Next time people go out, look for those trails from the jets that don't go away and actually turn into clouds.

Regular contrails dissipate almost immediately. When they spray things on you and me, those hang around for hours. Most who have looked into these trails think they are a combination of barium and aluminum, but there's surely more to the cocktail than these.

It's rare in Florida that we see pure blue skies any longer.
I don't mind this sort of stuff being shared... but has anyone considered that the term "sheeple" is fairly derogatory? I'm kind of insulted by it.
Jennifer Sabin said:
I don't mind this sort of stuff being shared... but has anyone considered that the term "sheeple" is fairly derogatory? I'm kind of insulted by it.


It's only derogatory if it applies to you.

I guess if the shoe fits, wear it.

But you aren't sheeple, are you?
Whether or not the shoe fits me, or anyone else for that matter, doesn't matter. Using derogatory terms to describe the "opposition" can't be good for your argument. Ad hominen attacks don't win arguments, they only polarize people and keep up from talking about the real issues.
Jennifer Sabin said:
Whether or not the shoe fits me, or anyone else for that matter, doesn't matter. Using derogatory terms to describe the "opposition" can't be good for your argument. Ad hominen attacks don't win arguments, they only polarize people and keep up from talking about the real issues.


I suppose calling someone a 'heroin addict' is derogatory as well. ......but there's nothing
wrong with identifying them and confronting them.

The term "sheeple" really means those who willingly have blinders on - who refuse to
acknowledge that there is inherit evil in government - that our freedoms/rights are being eroded on purpose - refuse to be vigilant in stopping this ongoing assault - and they even make fun or get angry at those who warn-about or try to stop this onslaught against the citizenry of the United States.

Along with Jessica Payne, I have no problem pointing-out someone who falls into this category.

I think the names that are polarizing are "tinfoil hat wearer", "conservative", "liberal", "conspiracy theorist", "radical", "terrorist", "left-wing", "right-wing", and things like that.

Those terms have ZERO meaning and are used on a daily basis by those who control the media and schooling to polarize and confuse this nation.

.

.
.

If I may, I'd like to give another example of another derogatory and polarizing statement
that's commonly used by government health officials and doctors which has NO
basis in truth and is extremely polarizing, libelous and dangerous:

Here's an article from webmd just the other day:

More Parents Refuse, Delay Child's Vaccinations


Excerpt:

"Parents who do not vaccinate are putting their child at risk and they are putting their peers and neighbors at risk as well," - Lance E. Rodewald, MD, the CDC's director of immunization services

(end excerpt)

So there you have a government official making a very libelous, derogatory, polarizing and erroneous statement against a large sector of the U.S. population.

So therefore, "sheeple" would best describe someone who would become angry at me for pointing this out but support the statements of this very disillusioned CDC official - even though it could someday lead to the rounding-up of those who do not agree and/or comply with such a false statement.

.
This is the first time the word "sheeple" has offended anyone to my knowledge! WOW!!!! There's one of two reasons this offended you. One- you are one of those people who willingly put the blinders on and knowingly ignore reality at all costs...... or two- you prefer others to keep blinders on for some reason. Are you a politician?

Jennifer Sabin said:
Whether or not the shoe fits me, or anyone else for that matter, doesn't matter. Using derogatory terms to describe the "opposition" can't be good for your argument. Ad hominen attacks don't win arguments, they only polarize people and keep up from talking about the real issues.
No. I am not a politician. I am a registered Libertarian (a classic liberal if you will) who, while vaccinating my 2 children, does so on a modified schedule that doesn't include all of the possible vaccines. I also happen to find name-calling offensive and unnecessary.

If the argument is good enough to stand on its own, then we don't need to resort to calling people names. I'm on your side more than I am not, but no one will listen to us/you if we sling mud at them. They'll just go take a shower and ignore us.

jessica payne said:
This is the first time the word "sheeple" has offended anyone to my knowledge! WOW!!!! There's one of two reasons this offended you. One- you are one of those people who willingly put the blinders on and knowingly ignore reality at all costs...... or two- you prefer others to keep blinders on for some reason. Are you a politician?

.

Wow, this has become a very interesting conversation, even if it's a bit off the original topic....(which is ok with me being the topic-starter).

I agree with both of you ladies on this topic of name-calling for different reasons and depending on the specific term or situation.

I generally HATE name-calling and hominem attacks. Usually that distracts from the topic-at-hand and turns the conversation into an excercise in playground bullying. However, for some reason, even though I never personally use it, the term 'sheeple' seems so appropriate for a GENERAL term for a large sector of the population. The reason I feels that way is because I get frustrated at how asleep the citizens in this nation are regarding certain topics, whether it be debt, the Constitution, health, education, evolution/Creation, etc and so-forth.

Anyhow, Jennifer, I really do hear-ya on what you are saying. I agree that name-calling seems to cloud the issue and turn people off........................but at the same time even I get frustrated at the general population and induldge in just a few choice labels.

The term 'sheeple' is a guilty pleasure of mine, but I probably should refrain from even that one.

But the fact remains, most people/groups are guilty of engaging in the whole name-calling/labeling/pigeonholing of large sectors of the society. As a whole, it's not productive.

This is a very worthwhile conversation and I'm glad it was brought up.

.
.

So what do you all think that the military is spraying everyone with various poisons/toxins/contaminants?

Is it ok to discuss things like this here?

Is it any wonder everyone is becoming sick and mentally incapaciated, even at early ages?

We have megalomanics in charge of our medicine, farming, governments, sciences, schools, industry, banking, etc and so-forth.

But nothing will change because 'commerce' and 'fitting-in' are more important than the long-term effects of our short-sightedness.

I know I sound insane right now, but deep in all of your hearts, you know I'm right.

Oooooops, I used the term 'megalomanic'.

That was name-calling.

.

Reply to Discussion

RSS

© 2012   Created by Ledger Media.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service